The statements and opinions herein are
solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of any organizations or individuals associated with the author, past or present.

Monday, March 25, 2013

Breaking (old) news: enviros are racist

While noted leaders of color are taking more control of their own destiny, the net effect is we are enabling another silo alongside sustainability. A doctrine that espouses inclusive systems thinking is spawning an apparatchik marked by separatism, not integration.

By Dave Newport

Sadly, it is old news.

A lot has been written about this. I recalled Tufts professor Julian Agyeman’s stirring challenge to us all at the Denver AASHE conference in “The Death of Campus Sustainability” last year.  Marcelo Bonta wrote a great “what to do about it” piece in Grist in 2008. The New York Times covered eco-diversity pioneer Jerome Ringo in 2009. And so forth.

Yet the lack of diversity is still endemic among the community of sustainability professionals, our leadership, our professional organizations, and the universities, companies, and governments we work for.  Just in higher education, AASHE reports that 92 percent of sustainability folks are white.

All old news.

Yes, I am an old white guy, and a borderline racist, it appears.  Not the hate-driven kind that runs around burning religious symbols in peoples’ front yard. No, mine is the unintentional, passive, clueless kind of racism born out of privilege.

My wake up call went like this:

Some years back a very sharp and wonderful African American student who worked in our Center outted me. We were talking about the excessive GHG emissions embedded in a meat diet vs. the less carbon intensive vegetarian diet.

“Don’t come to my neighborhood and talk about veggie burgers,” she admonished me. “Black people haven’t worked hard trying to climb past discrimination so we can earn income sufficient buy a steak just to have white-privileged Boulder greenies tell us to eat tofu.”

Serious reality check.

So when I read the Post’s story I expected to get an update on what else I hadn’t noticed. I was looking for new news. I found it in the comment section, not the story.

The father of the environmental justice movement, Robert Bullard, spurned the idea that people of color even wanted the mainstream environmental groups to integrate.

“It was never the intent of our largely people of color movement to "fold" ourselves into the national environmental and conservation movement,” Dr. Bullard commented under the story.  “The core of our movement has always been, ‘We Speak for Ourselves!’”

Indeed, why should people of color supplicate to the mainstream enviro groups and beg for inclusion? Other leaders note that even when people of color are partnered with enviro groups, they are only allowed to play supporting roles, not the lead.

“As the first and only female Hispanic appointed by a [California] Governor to serve on the South Coast AQMD Governing Board, I observed this far too often,” noted Cynthia Verdugo-Peralta, who is also President and CEO of SEETA, (Strategic Energy, Environmental and Transportation Alternatives, Inc), an NGO. “When the large established enviro group "partners" with a minority enviro group, they have them in the background, not out front where they need to be.”

Which explains where leaders of color are apparently going these days: solo.

Majora Carter spoke on campus a few weeks ago. She never said “sustainability.” She said “empowerment.” She didn’t say “environment.” She said “quality of life.” She never said “crime.” She said “hometown security.”  She didn’t even say the word “justice.” She said, “end bright flight.”

Most of all, she said it by herself just fine. The Sierra Club wasn’t there.

Indeed, Carter’s organization is leading its own charge. And she’s not alone.

We all have come to know Van Jones pretty well over the past few years. Jones’ wiki reports he is “co-founder of four non-profit organizations including Rebuild the Dream, of which he is president. In 1996, he founded the Ella Baker Center for Human Rights, a California non-governmental organization (NGO) working for alternatives to violence. In 2005, he co-founded Color of Change, an advocacy group for African Americans. In 2007, he founded Green for All, a national NGO dedicated to "building an inclusive green economy strong enough to lift people out of poverty.”

People of color apparently have little hope that the mainstream enviro movement is ever going to adequately represent their interests—so they are going it alone. More power to them, literally!  I love seeing Van Jones citied as an environmental expert on CNN where he is on camera seemingly 24/7.

Separate, but unequal

Yet while Jones, Carter, Bullard, Verdugo-Peralta, and other noted leaders of color are taking more control of their own destiny, the net effect is we are enabling another silo alongside sustainability. A doctrine that espouses inclusive systems-thinking is spawning an apparatchik marked by separatism, not integration.

While there has been incremental progress on social justice, it is still our least developed—yet perhaps most powerful—argument for change. The group privilege that inbreeds among white-dominated enviro groups and sustainabilistas perpetuates my brand of unintentional racism informed by ignorance, not malice. But it’s racism nonetheless.

Bob Bullard has seen this trend for a long time.

“Having written more than 18 books on the topic over the past 25 years, beginning with "Dumping in Dixie," its rather clear that environmental injustice and environmental racism are real and alive and well in the U.S. and around the globe,” he writes in the Post.

The environmental justice challenges faced by communities of color stemming from close proximity to pollution sources are sad and terrible--and tangible issues. The challenges the sustainability movement faces from being clueless are more vexing in that intangibles are harder to fix. As former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld amply proved, “you don’t know what you don’t know.”

Where do we start?

Sustainability is another word for justice, for what is just is sustainable, and what is unjust is not. ~ Rev Matthew Fox

This year we are going to try a different approach in my Center and see where it takes us. For starters, our Energy And Climate Conservation program is renovating its name to the Energy And Climate Justice program. What will that do? Seems like a little thing. Fair question. We will find out. But my hypothesis is that by following Aeygman’s advice and putting the “justice” emphasis out front, we will signal to people of color what we’re about.

Then we have to back it up. So the program folks are looking at re-messaging all their outreach about energy and climate to feature the justice elements therein. To do so, they will reach out to people of color and hopefully foster a dialogue that helps evolve message content that is both respectful and effective. The reaching out part is hard, requires consistent effort, and will face serious skepticism. But eighty percent of success is showing up. Other programmatic elements will also emerge from this brainstorming, I hope. Stay tuned.

It’s important to remember another fundamental truth of campus sustainability: students get it; follow their lead. It’s staff and administrators like me that are behind the ball. For instance, the Energy Action Coalition and the California Student Sustainability Coalition have done anti-oppression trainings as a requirement for all their staff and student leaders for years. The CSSC chapter at UCLA is called E3 (for Ecology, Economy, Equity). Why? Because they have to be relevant to students, and especially at UCLA, students are more ethnically, and (more so than a lot of universities) socioeconomically diverse. The CSSC chapter at UC San Diego also actively applies the three-legged stool model of sustainability, integrating environment and justice.

Marcelo Bonta is the director of the Centerfor Diversity & the Environment. The Grist article referenced above offers a tangible path towards increased diversity any of us can navigate. He writes:

  • “Find opportunities to diversify within your spheres of influence. Figure out what you can start doing today. What organizational responsibilities do you control and have influence over? For example, if you have access to discretionary funds or control of budgets, earmark money toward diversity activities. If you work on outreach, learn how to become culturally competent, and expand your outreach activities to include communities of color.
  • Seek opportunities to broaden your experience, expand your network and continue learning. Attend or organize diversity workshops, sessions, and trainings, which are becoming common at environmental conferences. Become involved in efforts that bring a broad range of organizations and people together, such as the Diverse Partners for Environmental Progress series of national summits and regional roundtables. Reach out to and learn from organizations that work on diversity issues, such as Environmental Learning for Kids. Numerous diversity resources can be found on the websites of organizations, including the resources section of the Center for Diversity & the Environment. The book Diversity and the Future of the U.S. Environmental Movement is one of the premier resources on the topic.
  • Find allies. Talk to others at your workplace and to people working on diversity issues outside your organization. Organize a lunch discussion about diversity issues at your workplace. Find or create a network of people with which you can comfortably discuss diversity issues. For example, a group in Portland, Ore., aptly named the Young Environmental Professionals of Color, meets monthly to network, strategize, and discuss various environmental topics that affect them.
  • Broaden your thought processes. Think long-term with an expansive vision. Constantly question your “business as usual.” Ask yourself questions like “For whom am I protecting these lands or waterways? When thinking of the communities or constituencies I serve, who do I think of? Who should I think of? What type of people would find working at my workplace appealing or not appealing? Why?”
  • Engage leaders at your workplace and foundations. Talk to leaders about adopting diversity as an organizational priority and taking action. Ask for a commitment of resources, especially money and staff time. Lack of funding devoted to diversity severely limits the scope for diversifying the movement. Ask your funders to provide grants for diversity efforts.
  • Start building relationships with communities and organizations of color now. If you want to start engaging people of color, you will need to invest time building relationships and trust, and provide something of value. You will need to do your homework about the community members, meet them, and speak to their environmental values.” 
Some of these strategies might work sometimes, and sometimes not. Different approaches for different contexts. Either way, I should probably have been doing more of this right along. But I am clueless, it seems. There are a lot of people smarter than me working hard every day in sustainability. I suspect we vote the same, worry about the same things in our society, and all try in our own ways to make things better. And we may be unintentional racists not because of hatred or bigotry, but because we are white people with a worldview informed by a relatively privileged life and devoid of the experience many people of color naturally acquire. So I am going to use the racist word to hopefully highlight the challenges we face—and the talent that we have to fix it.

Racism is a tough word itself beset by controversial definitions and interpretations—but we live in tough times.  The National Council of Churches Racial Justice Working Group defines racism as “the intentional or unintentional use of power to isolate, separate and exploit others . . . Racism is more than just a personal attitude; it is the institutionalized form of the attitude" 

Here’s my attitude: If we don’t address the diversity and social justice deficit in the movement to institutionalize sustainability WE will ALL be old news.


Sunday, March 3, 2013

Peak sustainability: the new normal?

If we are perceived as too expensive and damaging to society, how long before higher education starts to suffer the scrutiny and disdain society has shown towards previously favored industries gone bad?

 By Dave Newport

“I am always ready to learn although I do not always like being taught,” remarked Winston Churchill.

For instance, when it comes to sustainability, higher education sometimes discounts the sustainability lessons coming from the corporate world. Some academics are quick to point out the BP’s and Enrons of the world—and indict anything business does as avaricious and tainted. We can’t possibly learn anything about sustainability from them…

So, while I am brandishing quotes, it’s good to remember Harry Truman’s perspective that, “it's what you learn after you know it all that counts.”

For college students entering the workforce, they just want to learn if sustainability is the new normal in the corporate world. If so, what do I need to know to be employable?

An excellent recent report summarized the state of business-sustainability worldwide.

Bottom line for college grads: get a haircut and a suit. Corporate sustainability is rapidly evolving and they need you to be a broadly-skilled systems-thinker.

The report, The State of Green Business 2013, is compiled by respected journalist Joel Makower. It’s an interesting, well-researched report and I urge you to review it. In it, Makower summarizes ten business trends that all require new perspectives and new brains:

1.     Companies are taking stock of their natural capital.
2.     Sustainability is becoming a matter of risk & resilience
3.     Corporate sustainability reporting is becoming integrated into routine financials
4.     The “sharing” economy is off and running
5.     Commerce is increasingly relocalizing
6.     Machine-to-machine (M2M) is driving greener machines
7.     Sustainability Apps & online platforms are booming
8.     Investors are beginning to care about sustainability risks & benefits
9.     Companies are exceeding their sustainability goals. Now what?
10.  Peak sustainability: achievements up, but jobs down

Makower analyzes the strong and weak signals each of these trends is sending in the report. The last trend flows from a parallel analysis Makower’s reporting has unearthed: the number of new stand-alone, dedicated sustainability jobs in the corporate world peaked in 2009. Note that new jobs are still growing, just at a slower rate. Makower asks, "Have we passed peak sustainability?"


However, this may not be bad news; it may be part of a natural corporate process that embraces new opportunities first with singular focus but then integrates that practice across all jobs. So, while the growth of new “sustainability officers" in business is waning, the inclusion of sustainability-related principles and practices across all corporate jobs is up.

~ The sustainability officer as an endangered species? ~

At a conference last year, I was talking with a couple corporate social responsibility officers of major national brands. CSR is code for corporate sustainability. They disclosed their budgets for sustainability-related activities were increasingly being transferred into the company’s functional units when these programs were mature enough to demonstrate a relevant value proposition.

“Items listed as CSR in the budget shouldn’t be funded because those projects haven’t figured out how to make money yet,” one CSR director told me. “Real CSR stuff is part of everything we do, not a stand alone.”

What I was told maps to what Makower calls corporate “convergence.” According to Makower’s employment data:

“Over the past three years, we’ve seen a significant shift in the responsibilities and areas of functional oversight for sustainability leaders. Some vice presidents are witnessing a convergence of their responsibilities. For executives who have responsibility for at least one of the functions of environmental, health and safety (EHS) or corporate social responsibility (CSR), 44 percent have a combined responsibility for both departments. In 2010, only 24 percent had combined oversight for EHS and CSR.”

In a companion report published by, The State of the Sustainability Profession 2013, more detail emerges about convergence and what business is looking for—and paying for—in sustainability professionals.

It comes as no surprise that sustainability workers need broad skill sets. A diverse array of backgrounds, majors and minors inform sustainability careers in business, the report shows. However, business/management, engineering, and environmental studies were the top three. And the top thing sustainability professionals do in the corporate world is strategy development. Indeed, it’s all about systems-thinking; also known as convergence.

~ Take-aways for the academe ~

Convergence has some connotations for higher education too.

For instance, students interested in sustainability might want to think about beefing up their education by majoring in a traditional discipline along with a sustainability minor or certificate. For good measure and a dose of reality they might tack on some service/internships in relevant organizations that helps them hone their traditional vocation along with its sustainability implications. However, a straight-ahead “sustainability” degree—even if you can find one--may not be the best, most employable career path.

In light of the above, campuses might better serve their students by offering more industry-specific sustainability minors and certificates. Those are a lot easier to create—and potentially in more demand—than full up majors in sustainability.

Campuses might also think about the implications of increased investor understanding and scrutiny of sustainability risks in their portfolio. The academe has been loath to disclose or divest of unsustainable investments—but the pressure to do so will likely increase over time. Smart investment managers might think about how to get ahead of this trend.

It’s also possible that growth in new stand-alone campus sustainability departments has slowed and we also have seen a “peak sustainability” plateau that matches the corporate trend. This may be the trough between new waves or it may be permanent. Either way, it is clear that more campuses are asking more employees to be engaged in sustainability across the horizontal org chart. This is a good thing and may someday portend the extinction of the sustainability silo on campus as it becomes engrained in all job functions.

Campuses need to look at convergence another way as well: the convergence of sustainability as a challenge and opportunity across all disciplines and industry sectors. For instance, the emergence of the sharing economy, sustainability-apps, M2M, resilience, relocalization, and all the other new business trends are places where students need skills—and campuses need to integrate.

How many of our campuses, for instance, have adaptation plans for climate change? How many of us have integrated with emergency preparedness? How many have looked at our dependence on natural capital and identified future risks to our operations, supply chain, and consumer attitudes towards higher education? At risk here is something corporate execs worry about but we don’t so much: our moral/ethical license to operate. If we are perceived as too expensive and damaging to society, how long before higher education starts to suffer the scrutiny and disdain society has shown towards previously favored industries gone bad? Remember when tobacco was respected? Coal? Wall Street? Banks? Congress? OK, we will never get that bad…

~ Next? ~

If you are still in college, think about what you can learn now that goes to one or more of these trends. If you are a recent grad looking for a job, reframe and remanufacture your knowledge. Take some more courses, do internships. At a minimum read and talk to people. “Learn after you know it all.”

For the rest of us working in higher education, let’s continue to learn—and learn to like being taught.